I actually think that more optimization is needed even today, if it's technically possible.Įven new strong CPU's can have a hard time with some sounds in some applications from different manufactors. Some can be explained with better quality and such, but i also think, that developement might not take enough time to optimize the performance the way it was needed before. The developement seems to be that plugins use more CPU, as the CPUs become better. I too hope, something can and will be done about this.

So can other vendors applications for that matter. Some of Arturias synths can use much CPU, especially when used in poly modes.

I'm not asking you the questions to defend Synthis CPU usage or something like that, and i don't say Synthi V does'nt use much CPU, like you seem to think, that i do. I don't know whether this problem could easily solved with an update, because i think the reason is the basic programming. I think the programming of the Synthi V is bad and sloppy. This Synth has not many more parameters than all the other Synths, what could be the reason for this issue. > The same System where i can run the Supperior Drummer, Natives Kontakt (with a few Plugins open) Massive and Arturia Modular V3 and CS 80 V3 at the same time without any problems. > All these Software is running on the same System and when everything is working fine except one Plugin, i think the Problem is this Plugin not the System. I use E-MU 0404 as MiDi and Audio Interface.Īs Reference for System Load I use the VST Performance Bar in Cubase, the CPU Load indication in the Plugins and my ears. I am running Cubase 7.5 Artist and Cakewalk by Bandlab (newest Version) as HostsĪnd Arturia V-Collection 7 ( since V- Collection 3), Native Instruments Komplete Ultimate 10, Toontrack Supperior Drummer 2 and some Freeware as VST Plugins.

Synthi v